Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesla pipeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla pipeline

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is too confusing - cite 2 does not mention "Tesla" - it says Turkish Stream Chidgk1 (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked around and I suspect the IP editor who added cite 2 was confused with Balkan Stream or perhaps the name of the pipeline was changed before it was built Chidgk1 (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Austria, Greece, Hungary, North Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge, with TurkStream. This pipeline has not yet been completed. Passes WP:GNG per the sources in the article and those available elsewhere.^[1]^[2]^[3]

References

^ "EU approves construction of link roads for Turkish Stream". Daily Sabah. 20 November 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2022.
^ Gurbanov, Ilgar (2017). "Perspective for Turkish Stream Project: Possible Scenarios and Challenges" (PDF). Natural Gas World: 87–88.
^ B. Lana Guggenheim (18 January 2019). "Greece in Negotiations to Extend TurkStream To Europe, Through "Europe Stream"". South EU Summit. Retrieved 23 October 2022.

SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 01:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article will just confuse readers (I am sure as it confused me). Gas Interconnector Greece–Bulgaria and Balkan Stream are already operational. Nobody is going to build a pipeline called "Tesla pipeline". I don't blame you for being confused as the Balkans have been confusing people for at least a hundred years. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A vague proposal from 2015 with very uncertain future. Fails WP:CRYSTAL Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. (Actually, we can safely predict it's not going to be built.) No such user (talk) 09:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not seem notable. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] "EU approves construction of link roads for Turkish Stream". Daily Sabah. 20 November 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2022.

[2] Gurbanov, Ilgar (2017). "Perspective for Turkish Stream Project: Possible Scenarios and Challenges" (PDF). Natural Gas World: 87–88.

[3] B. Lana Guggenheim (18 January 2019). "Greece in Negotiations to Extend TurkStream To Europe, Through "Europe Stream"". South EU Summit. Retrieved 23 October 2022.

[1]

[2]

[3]