Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 27

< June 26	June 28 >

June 27

Template:Footer Movies Ajith Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to support deletion. JPG-GR (talk) 17:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Movies Ajith Kumar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless, absolutely unneccesary and unused template. Just another attempt of the editor to glorify his idol! Johannes003 (talk) 22:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—appears to be a useful aid to navigation. I'd edit the header in the template to be more neutral ("blockbuster" is a very subjective term) but otherwise I'd say to keep it. Imzadi 1979 → 18:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Peanuts character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peanuts character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{infobox character}}, so I replaced it with the standard. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Cheers, Jack Merridew 22:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant to the existing box with no justifiable reason for being separate. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—should be CSD T3-eligible. Imzadi 1979 → 00:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete —JonathanDP81 (Talk | contribs) 17:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Disney character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fully redundant to {{Infobox character}} and adds no additional parameters other than some in-universe parameters that were removed from the main infobox. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Cheers, Jack Merridew 22:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—should be CSD T3-eligible. Imzadi 1979 → 00:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nomination. Also its removal will give our Bambifan socks one less place to do damage. MarnetteD | Talk 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nomination. —JonathanDP81 (Talk | *contribs) 17:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. I think this template was deleted before. --LoЯd ۞pεth 03:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Disney's Fantasia Characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted as a creation of a banned user. Jack Merridew 04:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney's Fantasia Characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary "template" for doing a hardcoded, badly formatted table of characters from two films, half of which are not characters at all, just images. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above. Does nothing to enhance the understanding of the two films. MarnetteD | Talk 20:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Cheers, Jack Merridew 22:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—not useful per above. Imzadi 1979 → 00:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. May be the work of banned user User:Bambifan101. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MarinCountySupervisors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MarinCountySupervisors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All pages listed on this navbox have been turned into redirects pointing back to their main article. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—unnecessary. Imzadi 1979 → 00:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bryan Fuller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bryan Fuller (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete - template for three items is absolutely unnecessary. The three series are all extensively interlinked not only through Bryan Fuller but through the articles for the series and the creative professionals, many of whom Fuller works with repeatedly. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—not needed at this time. Can be recreated if the subject creates more series. Imzadi 1979 → 00:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; adds more complexity to the referencing system -— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 03:17, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—I'm not seeing the usefulness, but if there is one, I'm willing to revise my opinion. Imzadi 1979 → 18:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused. —fetch ·comms 13:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.