Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 19

< December 18	December 20 >

December 19

Template:Findlaw us

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge any useful features with {{ussc}}, then redirect. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Findlaw us (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, only a few translcusions, which can be replaced with {{Ussc}} —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:17, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: (Disclosure: I am the template's creator.) I have no objection to deprecating in favor of {{Ussc}}, since that template is more fully featured; I have used that one myself on occasion. That said, I personally find the visual presentation of the results of this template more visually appealing, and find the lack of the extlink indicator on the results of the other to be vaguely misleading. Nevertheless, it is obvious that this template never quite caught on. Thanks to Justin (koavf) for notifying me of this discussion, which I probably would not otherwise have noticed until it closed. --KGF0 ( T | C ) 09:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1998–99 Big East football teams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1998–99 Big East football teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1997–98 Big East football teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1996–97 Big East football teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1995–96 Big East football teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. All red links. Mhiji (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, not all red links. The 1995 Virginia Tech Hokies football team link in the 1995-96 template is now blue. - Dravecky (talk) 11:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough, but wasn't when I wrote it. Still delete as only one blue link. Mhiji (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A year has elapsed without the relevant pages being created, so it's safe to say the template is not useful. --KGF0 ( T | C ) 09:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1996–97 IHL Western Conference standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1996–97 IHL Western Conference standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1996–97 IHL Southwest Division standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1996–97 IHL Midwest Division standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:1996–97 IHL Central Division standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. All red links Mhiji (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. A template such as this is only useful if the teams themselves had season articles. Reso lute 18:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only really a single use template and its not even used for that. -DJSasso (talk) 19:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 EL South standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 EL South standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. All red links Mhiji (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 flu pandemic in North America table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 flu pandemic in North America table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2011 Armenian Premier League teamlist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2011 Armenian Premier League teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2011 Big 12 football standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2011 Big 12 football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All red links. Mhiji (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kent village navboxes-to-nowhere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warehorne (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Kenardington (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Newenden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These navigation box templates contain only redlinks, most only one redlink. Since they do not help the reader to navigate anywhere, they are pointless: navboxes-to-nowhere. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Useless. Mhiji (talk) 03:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not much point to these. -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Quite useless. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kent navboxes with less than 5 blue links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Collier Street (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Bethersden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pembury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Shadoxhurst (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chart Sutton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Sandhurst (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Stone-cum-Ebony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Smarden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Nettlestead (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Frittenden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Coxheath (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Each of these template contains less fewer than five blue links (i.e. links to existing pages); the first 5 templates contain only 1 blue link. When there are so few items, a navbox is an unnecessarily crude and intrusive device. It is much better to simply create any relevant links in the body text of the articles.

I have not removed any links from the templates in this section. Some of the templates include links to articles on people whose significance to the villages seems tenuous, but I have left them in place. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:NENAN. Mhiji (talk) 00:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Langley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Langley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another pointless navigation template for a tiny village in Kent, this time Langley, Kent.

The template contains nothing at all, except one redlink. Goodness knows why the creator thought this template was worth making, but as a navbox with nowhere to navigate it is 100% useless. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Creation was for completeness. Redlink is entirely valid. Mjroots (talk) 19:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boggle. Just what sort of "completeness" is achieved by creating a navbox-to-nowhere? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The red link isn't entirely valid. It shouldn't be there per WP:REDLINK and WP:NAVBOX#Properties. If we remove that there's nothing there! Mhiji (talk) 00:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Pretty clear cut case. Schwede 66 23:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Useless. WP:NENAN. Mhiji (talk) 00:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pretty useless navigation template for a single, tiny village. There's only one blue link anyway. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:46, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Walter Mart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Walter Mart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No parent article. Links only three articles, two of which are prodded and one of which is at AFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is only one blue link on this navbox, and it is at AFD (for good reason). --RL0919 (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Diamondbacks SBS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Diamondbacks SBS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template, not used anywhere, I have no idea what it's intended use is. Muboshgu (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like it would have been used on Arizona Diamondbacks to display the team's season-by-season record. As such, it would be a single use template anyway, as List of Arizona Diamondbacks seasons uses a more informative chart. Reso lute 18:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Bill Series Summary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused navbox. RL0919 (talk) 22:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Bill Series Summary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No articles transclude this template. The only article in which it is appropriate is List of The Bill episodes. One appropriate location does not justify a template; a hardcoded instance at that location is more useful in this case, which is what is there now. Neelix (talk) 21:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The links on the template actually point to the individual season lists, so it doesn't work that well on the complete episode list article. The List of The Bill episodes article seems a bit of duplication as well since there are separate season lists. I think I'll nominate that article as well, in which case it won't even be needed there. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gordana Kuić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gordana Kuić (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a navigation template where only the primary article exists; the rest of the links are redlinks. Since this is a navbox that provides no navigation, it should be deleted and recreated only when/if the additional articles are written. RL0919 (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator as pointless. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a quite pointless navigation template, contains mostly redlinks. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I made that template as I wanted to make articles for the books it includes. However, I haven't done it yet, so I think the template should be deleted per now. -- MarizzaRojas, 13:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC+1)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Joseph Kosinski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Underpopulated navbox. RL0919 (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joseph Kosinski (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links 2 articles. WP:NENAN. Mhiji (talk) 05:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - seems harmless enough. The director has signed-up to direct a series of films for Disney, so the list of articles will grow. That being said, there is no reason why the template could not be recreated at a later date. I must say that WP:NENAN is what I call a "deletionist essay" - one of several that simply want to make the project smaller for no other reason that it uses up unnecessary resources. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That essay doesn't mention anything about using up "unnecessary resources"... Mhiji (talk) 23:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wait until the other films exist first, WP:NENAN and all that. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete harmless doesn't mean necessary. delete it for now, and if here is a large enough templates for a navbox, then we remake the navbox, but as it is now. two films isn't enough.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Kosinski directed only 2 films so far and the template seems currently redundant (and may clut the pages). Twilightchill t 16:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NENAN. Is navigation between just 2 articles really needed? --LoЯd ۞pεth 01:29, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NENAN. WereWolf (talk) 01:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Billy Crystal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Underpopulated navbox. RL0919 (talk) 22:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Billy Crystal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links three articles. WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --KGF0 ( T | C ) 09:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete three articles is very little for a navigation template, unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.