Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mosslandingpowerplant/Archive
- Mosslandingpowerplant (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Mosslandingpowerplant
Mosslandingpowerplant (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 10 2009, 11:23 (UTC)
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Garbageplate (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Alanlevingreed (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Alanlevinsgreedy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 95.1fox (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by Kurt Shaped Box (talk)
Block-evading POV-pushing SPA sockpuppeteering on Brother Wease, introducing multiple BLP vios. I've already blocked all of the above as blatant socks - but I believe that a checkuser is warranted here in order to uncover any sleeper accounts. Thanks. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
This user has been vandalizing a single page (Brother Wease)for several months. It's the only page that they have made edits to, and all of the edits have been reverted. The user has not responded to attempts to help make their edits constructive (ie, avoiding NPOV & BLP issues, providing citations, etc.), and after being blocked, appears to have escalated the vandalism by creating and using new user accounts. Over the last 24 hours, nine different edits were made to the same page using three different accounts. I suspect this is the same person, because 1) this article has otherwise not been subject to vandalism, 2) these new user accounts popped up the day after the user was blocked, and 3) most of the vandalism is identical. If the user wants to make constructive edits (even if they're critical of the subject), I'm happy to engage him/her and help. Anson2995 (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- CheckUser requests
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Clerk endorsed To check for sleepers. Synergy 21:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Confirmed all four and Incanation (talk · contribs). IP blocked. Dominic·t 10:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Completed Mayalld (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Mayalld (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)