Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vritti
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Vritti
[edit]request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 09:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC) |
- Vritti (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Watchtower Sentinel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) --> currently being investigated on WP:SSP (see below for diff)
Already established as sockpuppets/puppeteers and blocked or banned:
- NoToFrauds (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
--> banned for disruptive editing - Terminator III (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
--> sockpuppet along with the following 4 on this list - Juan dela Cruz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Hamsacharya duh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Senior Hamsacharya (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Akal Purakh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: A
User is very new and suspiciously in cahoots with Watchtower Sentinel (talk · contribs), another brand new editor (who is being investigated for sockpuppet abuse), about a COI case. Looks too coincidental. See: [1], [2]. I think checking against Watchtower Sentinel or the two IPs should be sufficient to establish RFCU, but I added the other ones just in case he's being sneaky. --Hamsacharya dan 09:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Declined "A" requests go in the IP check section and require an explanation of why a block is otherwise insufficient. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.