Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 20

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 20, 2022.

Draft:5000 (year)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term in draft space with no history as a draft page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Year 1 kilo

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term in draft space with no history as a draft page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

4570s

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 27#4570s

Tarch Maharl

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other than some kind of exaggerated pronunciation, I don't know what this could mean. Without a justification, delete as not useful. MB 21:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3000s

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete any that have not been singled out to be kept or some alternative action. In such a large discussion, it would not be fair to delete any that have been objected to. Of course, this is without prejudice against renomination individually or in a small batch. -- Tavix (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following the closure of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_11#6100s, I decided to RfD the remaining decades redirects. The vast majority of these decades are not mentioned in any entry of the target, and are not likely to be searched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaundryPizza03 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure about 5150s & 5170s. Is this plural popular enough for people to search IBM computers with it? —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Most definitely, the IBM PC and PC/AT were frequently referred to by their model numbers (though less so than by their names), and were seminal machines of their era. And especially so for the 5150, as the original PC needed to be differentiated from other IBM PCs and PC-compatibles and clones -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 07:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

XXXIII century

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are 572 redirects to Timeline of the far future, at time of writing, but this is the only one to use Roman numerals, which is not customary for centuries. Originally targeted 33rd century before that page was merged to 4th millennium, which in turn got merged to the current target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suisare

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other than a google hit for urban dictionary, I cannot find anyone using suisare to mean party. Furthermore, the urban dictionary definition seems to be from a while ago and hasn't really gained any traction. TartarTorte 21:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2022 evacuation of the Donetsk People's Republic and the Luhansk People's Republics

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typo (extra "s" at the end) left behind from a page move. It is highly unlikely anyone would accidentally add an "s" to "Luhansk People's Republic", a proper name. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stonewall Heights

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stonewall Heights is a name a developer tried to name a portion of Kensington, Philadelphia in 2017 that gained no traction anywhere in usage. It's not mentioned at the current target article or at the Kensington, Philadelphia article, furthermore a publicity stunt by a developer is not notable enough to be included on wikipedia; therefore, I recommend deletion. TartarTorte 19:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rural Canada

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was an article about rural Canada before being BLARred, which wasn't necessarily an incorrect decision as the article was in a mostly unsourced and essay like state at the time, but its current target doesn't really have any relevant information on rural Canada as a concept. TartarTorte 19:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging from the page history relevant parties to the discussion (Trillfendi—Canadaolympic989—Ulric1313—Katharineamy—KH-1) TartarTorte 19:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spellbound Interactive

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect. The company in the target article was based in Germany and never went by "Spellbound Interactive". Conversely, Spellbound Interactive was based in England. The two companies are not related. IceWelder [✉] 18:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Intergenerational ethics

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intergenerational equity and intergenerational ethics are two quite distinct areas of study – the former is something studied mostly in economics and the latter mostly in moral philosophy – and the latter isn't discussed in the article on the former, or in any other article in sufficient depth to be worth retargeting. As such, WP:RDEL #10 applies and we're better off deleting this to encourage creation of an article on this topic. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butter (alchemy)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I see no articles listed on the target disambiguation page that relate to the use of butter in alchemy (or things in alchemy called butter), nor is there a section with the header, "Alchemy". BD2412 T 04:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and merge the original disambig to Butter (disambiguation). Create a new section called "Chemical compounds" for the two pages in the original disambig. This should resolve most issues related to the redirect. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:DDBB:5FD1:FCB9:EB0C (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Shhhnotsoloud as there is nothing in enwiki on this. Agree with Uanfala that there are no entries worth disambiguating either at the redirect title or the target title. Entries were merged from the alchemy dab to the general dab, which were then removed, hence there is no point in a "re-merge". If this is not going to be deleted, retarget to Antimony trichloride which mentions it was known to alchemists as butter of antimony. Jay 💬 10:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:GAMESOURCES

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Added hatnote to the alternate board and table games page. Jay 💬 09:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since we also have Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games/Sources, I think this should become a disambig. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and add a hatnote. There is no reason to break or change the many existing incomming links that clearly intend this target. Thryduulf (talk) 10:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add a hatnote per Thryduulf. Retargeting or disambiguation would disrupt too many links (30 at the moment, excluding the target page and links related to this RFD) and established shortcut usage to be worth it. This is the project namespace, so users won't be confused just because they have to click a hatnote at the top of the page. Glades12 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and hatnote. Links from discussions are easy to fix, but we can't change links from edit summaries, and sources lists get lots of use in edit summaries (e.g. "rv, not reliable, see WP:GAMESOURCES"). 61.239.39.90 (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arashabbasi

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 27#Arashabbasi

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_20&oldid=1108666610"