Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 28

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 28, 2014.

P Doradus

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:10, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo; the letters "P" and "R" are not near each other on a standard keyboard, and there is no reason that somebody would get the two letters confused. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

G Canis Minoris

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Designation does not exist, and is not a plausible typo. "G Canis Majoris" is a latin letter Bayer designation, which Canis Minor lacks, and there is no way somebody would forget the "50" before the G. In addition, even if that were not the case, G Canis Minoris could refer to any number of the over 50 stars designation in Gould's catalogue. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Name of article

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salted too. --BDD (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be deleted - for the same reason that like this one doesn't exist, this one shouldn't exist either. Most links are example text, and I recently found a malformed redirect pointing here, which would be detected much quicker if such a redirect were red linked. Not tagged as page is fully protected. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added the RfD tag for you. Thryduulf (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Windows NT 7.0

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 22#Windows NT 7.0

Category:Muhammad (صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. For future reference, Koavf, deletion for category redirects should take place at CfD. If it helps you remember, category redirects aren't true redirects (and are, technically, categories). I'm comfortable deleting this one, however. --BDD (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded redirect: this is the English Wikipedia and category redirects are very rare. —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Howard Dill

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of Howard Dill on Atlantic Giant. However, the redirect includes an external link to the man's obituary. (Of course, no one will find this unless they specifically look at the redirect page.) According to the obit, Dill grew prize-winning pumpkins. If that makes him noteworthy, the information might be added to Atlantic Giant, but if he doesn't satisfy BIO perhaps the redirect should be deleted. Cnilep (talk) 01:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.