Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/br
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
If there is any productive use for a template which transcludes dozens of line break tags, it is not forthcoming. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Template of an alternate account of a retired user. However, the 5 pages that transclude it do so to good effect. Achowat (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- They most assuredly do not. All this template does is push the page footer further down the page. In every existing transclusion this template negatively affects the page display. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Not at Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/Newsletter/20091001/Contest. Not at Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/Newsletter/20091001/Interview. The first two transclusions. The very first two; if you remove the transclusion, the page looks like hell. I didn't check the rest, but I'd love to see an example (of the 5) where this template "negatively affects the page display". Achowat (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- They most assuredly do not. All this template does is push the page footer further down the page. In every existing transclusion this template negatively affects the page display. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete apparently useless template. OSborn arfcontribs. 22:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- I cannot think of any good reason to add many lines of whitespace at the bottom of the several pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Not very useful, but it's in userspace and not in contravention of policies or guidelines, as far as I can see. Leave it alone. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.