Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 1

< June 30	July 2 >

July 1

File:Sunburnpromo2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cover of a non-notable promo version of the single "Sunburn", when the actual single covers are already featured in the article. Unnecessary. FamblyCat94 (talk) 00:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blisspromo2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable promo CD cover for "Bliss"; unnecessary when the single has proper covers that are already included on the album. FamblyCat94 (talk) 00:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Election Day (1815) painting by Kimmel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A better scan is available on Commons: File:Election Day 1815 by John Lewis Krimmel.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found this file when looking for watermarked images to clean up, and then I found the better commons version. I updated the one page that used this image to use the commons one, so this is an orphan now. Robman94 (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to the higher-quality Commons file and potential derivative files that could be easily produced if necessary. ~ Rob^Talk 15:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for below-minimum quality and improper use of in-image captions. Ibadibam (talk) 19:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barangay Map of Sariaya.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not own work as claimed. The image is a map of barangays with a municipal seal on it. The summary includes the claim "I own this photo". However, the uploader is not above lying to get material on to Wikipedia. Recetnly, with this edit, he claimed the added material was "own work please don't remove" but was in fact copied from a web site. I am very doubtful of the claim of ownership of this image. Whpq (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William Crosby Dawson Etching.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:William Crosby Dawson.jpg and used only on a talk page where it isn't part of any discussion. ~ Rob^Talk 06:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rodeoalbumdeluxe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a, no contextual significance to have a separate cover —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ddulogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 09:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DianneFHarrison.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 10:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Entrepot company logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be PD-textlogo. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was moved from File:Company Logo png.png to File:Entrepot company logo.png by EuroCarGT (talk · contribs) at 20:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Green Flake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 01:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the subject of the photo died in 1903, then why is it assumed that free images of the person do not exist? Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say that it is assumed, but after thorough and extensive searching, one has yet to be found. If one can be found I would gladly replace the fair-use image. Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 20:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Olam LOGO RGB COLOUR reduced resolution transparent.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as is. — ξ ^xplicit 01:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is currently being used for violating WP:NFCC#9 on Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop, but I'm not sure if it meets the threshold of originality. Opinions? Stefan2 (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed --S Philbrick (Talk) 18:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USA Rugby Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in USA Rugby, remove all other instances. — ξ ^xplicit 01:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This violates WP:NFCC#9 on User:Pg.ak61/sandbox. It also seems to be used on too many other pages. Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if deleting the image is the right approach. It would seem to have a strong fair use argument to be used on USA Rugby, but probably should be removed from all the other articles. Mattlore (talk) 23:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nazia and Zohaib.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not own work. Bad aspect ratio screen grab that can be found on some wallpaper sites Whpq (talk) 22:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nazia hassan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not own work. Image is found all over the Internet. Whpq (talk) 22:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juan Habichuela flamenco guitarist.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image claims fair use but has a free licence - it can't be both, besides which it has no source so we cannot verify its copyright status. ww2censor (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of the many sources is here. Would you be so kind as to change the licensing to a more appropriate and correct one. Kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 06:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Checkingfax: ...similar adjustments made here as to file File:Antonio Rey Navas.jpg below. Trust this is of help. Kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 22:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Checkingfax: added more appropriate {{Non-free biog-pic}} and Non-free use rationale. I trust this is now the correct copyright notice in all parameters and will be of helpful. PS. For someone who has translated Canadian copyright laws for three decades, WP sure is a challenge

; hope I got it right, or close. kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 06:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Antonio Rey Navas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is claimed to be a fair use image but has a free licence - it can't be both, besides which it has no source so we cannot verify its copyright status ww2censor (talk) 23:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source of this file is here. Would you be so kind as to change the licensing to a more appropriate and correct one. Kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 06:12, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Checkingfax: The description has been updated and the licensing tag removed. In now states (highlighting mine):

This image is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

The image is used as visual identification of the article topic
The image is only used on one article
It is a low resolution image, and thus not suitable for production of counterfeit goods
The image is not used in such a way that the reader would be confused into believing that the article is written or authorized by the owner of the photo
Is only used for infobox identification of the subject of a biographical article
Use of the image is consistent with fair-use provisions
The image is of a small size consistent with fair-use
A single small image or extract sufficient for the intended purpose without being excessive
Cropped, color, very low res

I trust this may be deemed an improvement. Thanks so much for your time and attention. kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 22:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unfortunately that is no better because we do not adhere to US fair use laws but have a much stricter policy. We do not accept images of people who are alive so the image fails WP:NFCC#1 because a freely licensed image can be made if someone goes to one of his concerts and takes a photo to release with a free license. The uploader has not bothered to add the source to the image but instead provided it here repeating the fair use claims used but provides no acceptable justification for the use of the non-free image, and the licence has also been removed, so it is now also unlicensed. The source webpage clearly show a copyright notice. ww2censor (talk) 22:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: @Checkingfax: I believe more appropriate {{Non-free biog-pic}} and Non-free use rationale are now in place. kindly re-visit File:Antonio Rey Navas.jpg. I believe this is now the correct copyright notice in all parameters and will be of the proper use. kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 06:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but despite your changes to the image details as previously stated, we do not accept non-free image of living people. It still fails WP:NFCC#1. ww2censor (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:NFCC#1. As a living person, one could reasonably expect that a free image could be taken of him . -- Whpq (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jean-Luc Montminy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is claimed to be a fair use image but has a free licence - it can't be both, besides which it has no source so we cannot verify its copyright status. ww2censor (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source of this file is here. Would you be so kind as to change the licensing to a more appropriate and correct one. Kind regards, Natalie Desautels _{…as within, so without} 06:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My personal photo.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Harry Gouvas, Greece, 2009.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cleopatra's Ship Rams Sockets. Nicopolis, Preveza.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ancient Verenice Tomb, Michalitsi, Preveza.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.