Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 26

< June 25	June 27 >

June 26

File:Behemoth Roller Coaster Layout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY^>Fireworks!< 22:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that this file meets the Non-free media use rules for two reasons, firstly it is not curial to the article and secondly it is replaceable by a free version. Mtking (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As the article is about the rollercoaster itself, I think a graphic of the layout is quite significant to the article, and it is unlikely we would be able to obtain a free content photo of the whole rollercoaster layout. Secondly, you could argue that the rollercoaster layout itself is copyrighted, so a drawing/graphic made by someone else could constitute an unauthorized derivative work. Acather96 (talk) 08:36, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree about the replaceable point, it is more than possible to take a free replacement picture. As for the "quite significant to the article", the article has existed for nearly four years without it. Mtking (talk) 21:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about the rollercoaster, the diagram adds to it significantly by showing the full layout of the rollercoaster, and is a useful visual aid to comprehend what the text is trying to convey. It's irrelevant that it hasn't been there for four years. And I am still of the belief that it would be very unlikely we could get a picture of the rollercoaster which showed the entire layout with the same clarity as the diagram does, and even moreso one under a free license. Acather96 (talk) 06:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe that the model is a very nice addition to the article. Perhaps it isn't "quite significant" but I believe that it is valuable. ShdSlyr2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ady Dayman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo uploaded for deleted article Ady Dayman B (talk) 02:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rev-VIII.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of a dog taken from Texas A&M's website. The dog still exists, is seen regularly by plenty of people at Texas A&M, and is regularly on the sidelines at football games. A free photo could easily be produced. For example, we have a photo of its predecessor File:Reveille-TAMU-Mascot.JPG. B (talk) 02:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01405.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in userspace, poor quality and lack of description make this unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also possible G4 per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 December 17#Image:DSC01405.JPG Acather96 (talk) 07:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01535.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Un-used enlargement of File:Atlantic Hall, Poka-Epe.jpg Acather96 (talk) 07:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cleanup.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Art guitar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, not sure who person is. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image information had got lost in a previous edit- restored... From the infromation recovered it looks like a picture of the user concerned. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's an orphaned userphoto, I readded the FFD tag and still say delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Train2104 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DuffingMap.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inferior to File:DuffingMap.png; JPEG is meant for photos, not graphs. No point in having redundant images like this. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eminem relapse coverart.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If indeed user-created, unencyclopedic (since we have File:Relapse (album).jpg). If not user-created, is an orphaned non-free file (which fails WP:NFCC). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4-AT.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Was incompletely closed as Delete by User:Fastily RunningOnBrains^(talk) 04:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is another block request, using the first file as an anchor. The request refers to all the files in Category:BadSVG Chemical Structures. These are orphaned files, all of which are bad SVG in terms of having some bug in the svg code which is preventing display or causing the fonts not to scale at different resolutions (the majority were drawn with BKchem). The files that are in use have been separated out and are being slowly corrected to remove the bugs. It is asked that any major concerns are also added to the main talk at Category_talk:Unclassified_Chemical_Structures#Bad_SVG Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:25, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.