Jump to content

Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations/Completed/22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Látches → Puffin

[edit]

Status:     Done

Látches Lets talk! 13:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nxxxn → Leone

[edit]

Status:     Done

Nxxxn (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Nxxxn (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hm, there are several other-language users using this username, however they're somewhat inactive. It still might present a problem for unification since they have several hundred edits. –xenotalk 16:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The work going on? There are no contributions of the user here for sure. Still the name can be changed over here to Leon, isn't it? I would like to take the SUL account. Nxxxn (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's "Leone". With an 'e'. :) The SUL account does not exist. Please look at the global contributions part. It says SUL account doesn't exist. I would like to take the SUL for this account. It has to be highlighted that this user "Leone" doesn't even have logs. Not even a single contribution. Nxxxn (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, above you wrote 'Leon' so I thought maybe you were providing alternatives. We are trying our best not to create conflicts with other global users, however this may still be permitted based on inactivity. It's under consideration and decision will be made after the hold period. –xenotalk 17:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually I meant Leone. Misspelled on the part... :P So at least for the English wikipedia the name can be changed, right? I would rather prefer if it is an SUL account for Leone. About how long may it take? Nxxxn (talk) 05:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Xeno, why it's taking so long??? Leone is completely inactive. The log is completely empty. So at least please change the name for me in English Wikipedia. But still I prefer a unified account over one which is not unified. I have waited for quite some time. If my previous message was replied then it could have been a lot easy. Anyway, about how long will it take for the hold period? Nxxxn (talk) 12:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • As indicated in the preamble, requests are filled after 7 days. If you "prefer a [fully] unified account", you should probably choose one that doesn't have other-language cognates which may not be eligible for usurp at the other projects due to their edit count. –xenotalk 13:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • So no problem even though it's not a fully unified account. Anywhere possible among all the projects please unify. My first priority is English Wikipedia. If the unification process takes longer and if I will be able to unify somewhere in the future, please let me know and change the name only here in English Wikipedia. But if the time taken for both changing here and unification is the same, a unified account from the possible projects is what I prefer. The 7 day period comes to an end today. So hope today my request is to be filled. :D Nxxxn (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Donexenotalk 13:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you very much Xeno. :D Leone (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kedster → Tony Webster

[edit]

Status:     Done

Kedster (talk / contribs) 04:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 6 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 6 total edits. Requesting user has 143 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 04:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ameena86 → Ameena

[edit]

Status:     Done

Ameena86 (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • {{notdone}} As noted in the preamble, usurp requests are granted to established users to ensure that usurped usernames be put to good use. Please re-request this after you have been editing for a while. Otherwise it looks ok because only project where this username has edits is de.wiki and the user only edited their userspace and is inactive. –xenotalk 14:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I understand what you mean. But I have been editing from a Dynamic IP since 2007, and have only recently decided to register this account. I intended to go as "Ameena", but it was already registered. I created this account purely for the purpose of carrying out the Usurpation process. Thank you. Ameena86 (talk) 04:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if it is possible and not against any rules, please do not transfer the edits from this account to the new account; because as I mentioned, I created this account purely for the purpose of carrying out the usurpation process. Thanks. Ameena86 (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. –xenotalk 17:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Fixed request to usurp only form. Also, creating this account for this purpose is unnecessary. You can create the request as an IP. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 23° 19' 15" NET 01:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well they've already created the temporary account, so it doesn't really make sense to make this 'usurp only'... Especially since if we vacate the name someone other than the requestor could scoop it up... I've just noticed target user hadn't been notified, so I've done this... Will need at least some hold period... –xenotalk 13:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butterfly voyages → Butterfly austral

[edit]

Status:     Done

Butterfly effect 17:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 17 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you fr:User:Butterfly austral? Since they have the best claim to the SUL account. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 16° 3' 45" NET 01:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think they are. The account got created automatically on login.
 Bureaucrat note: Verification requested. Please log in to your home wiki and make an edit at your talk page certifying this request. –xenotalk 19:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
yes I'm Butterfly austral now (Home wiki => fr.wikipedia.org) : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Butterfly_austral ; http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit ; fr:wp => 7 septembre 2010 à 13:22 Céréales Killer (discuter | contributions) a renommé « Utilisateur:Butterfly effect » en « Butterfly austral » ‎ (7 917 modifications. Motif : Demande de l'utilisateur http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spécial:Journal/renameuser ; http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Butterfly_austral#Nouvelle_identit.C3.A9 Cheers --Butterfly austral (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

=> Thanks a lot Xeno ! Cheers ! Butterfly austral 19:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cassandra 73 → January

[edit]

Status:     Done

Cassandra 73 talk 16:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The thwiki and frwiki users seem inactive and none of them appear to have GDFL significant edits. This may indeed qualify for a speedy usurp. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 21° 24' 15" NET 01:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 8665 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Igor.ratsy → ratsy

[edit]

Status:     Done

Igor.ratsy (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This may qualify for a speedy usurp. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 24° 3' 15" NET 01:36, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


N.samimi island → Insomniac

[edit]

Status:     Done

N.samimi island (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question: If I change my username here, does it effect my global users too? Or Should I ask bureaucrats of the related Wiki? N.samimi island (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Only the local user will be renamed. There is no global renaming yet. –xenotalk 13:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's alright, I changed my username in Fa.wiki to Insomniac.Anyway, How much longer is this gonna take? Till the Ja.wiki agrees? N.samimi island (talk) 17:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you are now fa:User:Insomniac then you could just make another 18 edits there, which will transfer the home wiki for insomniac to you, so you won't need to wait for the ja wiki user to confirm. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 17° 36' 45" NET 01:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying that if I make another 18 edits to my fa.wiki user then my en.wiki username will automatically change to Insomniac? Also, you made a notification here that since the user Insomniac has made an edit once, I can't change my username ... but,the en.wiki Inomniac has been inactive since 2003 ... N.samimi island (talk) 03:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am saying that if you make another 18 edits to your fa.wiki user then the home wiki mentioned here will change from jawiki to fawiki giving you superior claim to the SUL account. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 341° 47' 15" NET 22:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 263 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you xeno! Much appreciated :) Insomniac (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


None (SUL request) → L

[edit]

Status:     Done

62.226.138.235 (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I forgot the notify, but xeno added it on the talk page. --L temp (talk)


None (SUL request) → Wikidao

[edit]

Status:     Done

Wikiscient (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently changed my username from "Wikiscient" to "WikiDao". I want to keep "WikiDao". My request here concerns the username "Wikidao" which exists but has not been used. May I usurp it solely for the purpose of redirecting it to "WikiDao" and is this request the right way to go about it? Note that "Wikiscient" has already been renamed to "WikiDao" and I am not asking to change it again here. Wikiscient (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Request for doppelganger purposes - looks fine after hold. –xenotalk 19:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HtmFin → Htm

[edit]

Status:     Done

HtmFin (talk) 08:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 30 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 08:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: I believe this qualifies for a speedy usurp, since the enwiki user is very dormant. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 266° 31' 45" NET 17:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep -  Done. –xenotalk 18:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You, Xeno! Htm (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


La Mesa → Penom

[edit]

Status:     Done

La Mesa (talk) 20:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 21 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: This may qualify for a speedy usurp since User:Penom was created over 3 years ago (06 April 2007), has no edits and only exists here. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 342° 54' 15" NET 22:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → U3

[edit]

Status:     Done

62.159.188.146 (talk) 12:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The bot is in error, the notification was left on the target's talk page here on enwiki, see [1]. Courcelles 09:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Set Sail For The Seven Seas 183° 53' 15" NET 12:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiwind2 → Wikiwind

[edit]

Status:     Done

Wikiwind2 (talk) 09:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for disturbing, but if username is not registered why I can't add it to my global account. When a try it says that i must enter password to confirm that Wikiwind account belongs to me.--Wikiwind2 (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The bot was confused. –xenotalk 13:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I want Wikiwind account here unified with Wikiwind account on serbian wikipedia, I hope you understand now!--Wikiwind2 (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Verification requested. Please log in to your home wiki and make an edit at your talk page certifying this request. –xenotalk 13:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done[2]--Wikiwind2 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Looks fine after a brief hold (if no objections). –xenotalk 14:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 4 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Samit Boonyaruk → Asterisker

[edit]

Status:     Done

Samit Boonyaruk (talk) 10:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 52 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: This may qualify for a speedy usurp since User:Asterisker was created over a year ago (29 April 2009), has no edits and only exists here. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 332° 20' 45" NET 22:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Mel22

[edit]

Status:     Done

Mel2222 (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MarioS-de → MarioS

[edit]

Status:     Done

MarioS-de (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The target account has 3 edits in a single article, 2 of them minor. It was last active in January 2004 and the single paragraph that is essentially its only contribution has since been replaced. MarioS-de (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 3 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 3 total edits. Requesting user has 22 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boghog2 → Boghog

[edit]

Status:     Done

Boghog (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 28515 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you commons:User:Boghog ? –xenotalk 20:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am commons:User:Boghog2. Assuming my request here is granted, I will also request that my commons user name be changed from Boghog2 to Boghog. As far as I can tell, the commons:User:Boghog account does not yet exist. Boghog (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It does exist there, see commons:Special:Contributions/Boghog. Based on the contributions, you might not be able to usurp the account there. You might consider hinging this upon the commons request, rather than the other way around. It looks fine here, but we typically try not to create SUL conflicts (though the commons user is inactive since 2 years). –xenotalk 20:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Opps! That was also me, the files that commons:User:Boghog uploaded are no question mine. commons:User:Boghog last edit was on 24 August 2008 and commons:User:Boghog2 first edit was on 31 August 2008. So I must have switched account names. Sorry for the confusion. Per your request, I will first try to sort things out with my commons accounts. Please put this request on hold and I will get back to your as soon as I hear something from the commons administrators. Thanks for your help. Boghog (talk) 20:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. This request can proceed once you enable the SUL for Boghog and certify it's you. Do note that because of your impressive edit count, it may take upwards of several weeks for all your contributions to move. –xenotalk 20:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per your suggestion, my account name on commons has now been changed from Boghog2 to Boghog (see link). However it is not clear to me how to enable the SUL for user Boghog since Boghog is apparently still an activate account, although no edits have been made using this account. What do I do next? Boghog2 (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great! I am now logged in as Boghog. Thanks for your help! Cheers. Boghog (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

VIPer7asdf → VIPer7

[edit]

Status:     Done

VIPer7asdf (talk) 12:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby confirm this! --VIPer7 (talk) 12:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 1 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 8 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jmanfffreak → Jguy

[edit]

Status:     Done

Jmanfffreak (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC) Reason: This is my desired and common username for most of my accounts on the internet. Thank you for your time. Jmanfffreak (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 39 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: User:Jguy was created over four years ago (24 March 2006) and has no edits. Also, fr:User:Jguy has no edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 258° 38' 45" NET 17:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: en_pedia account was created in 2006 and has no live edits nor deleted edits; fr_pedia account has no live edits nor deleted edits. The SUL isn't registered. If the user doesn't object to being usurped on his talkpage, it looks like the usurpation can carry on. —Waterfox (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Errisper → Rash

[edit]

Status:     Done

Errisper (talk) 23:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 92 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you meta:User:Rash or ja:User:Rash? Since they have the best claim to the SUL. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 194° 45' 45" NET 12:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am not meta:User:Rash or ja:User:Rash, but their last edits were on March 10 2006 and May 15 2007, it is very likely that they're no longer used. Errisper (talk) 15:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Brainlara73 → Talha

[edit]

Status:     Done

TalhaDiscuss © 06:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3041 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 06:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with using a real name? Set Sail For The Seven Seas 178° 40' 15" NET 11:54, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
yes i am well aware and i am comfortable with my real name. I have also linked my FaceBook profile on my user page, any one can check for confirmation. --TalhaDiscuss © 12:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you da:User:Talha? Since they have the best claim to the SUL. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 192° 46' 30" NET 12:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is not me, i only use User:Brainlara73, commons:User:Brainlara73, pnb:User:Brainlara73 and ur:صارف:Brainlara73. --TalhaDiscuss © 05:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


RhoneDmDery → Rhone

[edit]

Status:     Done

RhoneDmDery (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 51 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Blasphemer1978 → Blasphemer

[edit]

Status:     Done

Blasphemer1978 (talk) 11:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 11:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please leave a message at he:user talk:Blasphemer confirming this request? –xenotalk 12:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, what exactly to post there? the same wiki code I used here or just write a request? Blasphemer1978 (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just something to the effect of "I certify I made the request to usurp Blasphemer on en.wiki". –xenotalk 14:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. added a rough translation to hebrew for he.wikipedia supervisors just in case. Blasphemer1978 (talk) 14:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All set to be processed after a brief hold. –xenotalk 15:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First, Thank you. Second, what do I do now? I gather I have to wait for a week? I just need to register Blasphemer ? Blasphemer1978 (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing, once the rename has been carried out, which it hasn't yet, you can just login as Blasphemer. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 233° 42' 30" NET 15:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oki doki, Thanks and good day! Blasphemer1978 (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :-)

Kaacper → Kashmiri

[edit]

Status:     Done

kashmiri (talk) 01:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 3 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 3 total edits. Requesting user has 330 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As a note, I noticed the three edits were the creation of a new article, that we still have. The three edits are enough to be GFDL significant, as well. Courcelles 17:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Actually, it's not necessarily the creation of a new article, since the edit is not flagged with a capital "N" as is done for page creations. It's possible that there have been previous edits that have been lost many years ago. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 188° 57' 30" NET 12:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would hazard a guess that such flags didn't exist in 2005. –xenotalk 15:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Correct. It's safe to assume the target account created that article. WJBscribe (talk) 10:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the editors' contributions are indeed cc-by-sa/GFDL-significant as the edits represent the genesis of the Kashmiri Gate (Delhi) article and the information originally provided persists in the article to this day. If the user happens to consent, this can proceed - you might consider sending them an email. However, I will leave this for another bureaucrat to provide a second opinion and wouldn't object if it were fulfilled. –xenotalk 15:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I emailed the user today and am awaiting his/her response, although it would be helpful if a bureaucrat could check out whether the user's email address is correct (= the message did not bounce). BTW, I wonder what the policy is when a user cannot be contacted due to invalid email address on file? kashmiri (talk) 05:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Flagged request as on hold. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 238° 34' 15" NET 15:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Second opinion. This is a pretty borderline call. I am reasonably satisfied that renaming a user from "Foo" to "Foo (renamed)" is unlikely to violate the GFDL (I think the belief otherwise is an overly literal reading of the GFDL obligation to preserve the history of an article). On this basis, I would likely perform this request were it to unify an existing SUL. However, in this case we are looking at a request for a new SUL, when you could request a new name that doesn't give rise to these issues, which would usually make me lean towards declining the request. In this instance however, the name has so few edits across projects that I think that would just be putting off the issue (it's a name bound to be used by an active user on some project or another some day).
So, I think this request should go ahead. But the current owner of the name should be given a full week to reply to the email he has been sent. WJBscribe (talk) 10:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A full week and one day has passed since the current owner was emailed; and much longer since a suitable notice was left on his/her Talk page, to no response. As the hold expired yesterday, any chances the request will move forward soon? kashmiri (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (X! · talk)  · @136  ·  02:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! kashmiri (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lyricnz2 → Lyricnz

[edit]

Status:     Done

164.53.222.21 (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no talk page, and anonymous cannot create.

So you are saying you originally registered this username sometime ago? If so, you'll need to create a temporary account to receive the name. –xenotalk 12:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Yes, I believe I am the owner of the original account, however I must have used an old email address, which is no longer available. I have created a temporary user user:lyricnz2 to receive the name. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyricnz2 (talkcontribs) 02:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Updated request format. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 331° 56' 30" NET 22:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Punyu → Puny

[edit]

Status:     Done

Punyu (talk) 16:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 12 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold, since all the accounts were created overs two years ago and have no edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 249° 48' 45" NET 16:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 11:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Act Class 1742 → Class Act

[edit]

Status:     Done

Act Class 1742 (talk) 19:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to use this username instead, it's simpler and it doesn't seem to be in use that I can tell. Thanks for your time.

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold, since the account has no edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 173° 7' 45" NET 11:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allmightyduck's Shortcut → AMD

[edit]

Status:     Done

Allmightyduck's Shortcut aka Allmightyduck (Talk) 20:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an edit from me to confirm. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 20:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 2 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 20:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you ja:User:AMD? Since they have the best claim to the SUL. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 172° 7' 30" NET 11:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am not. I do not plan on unifying, though. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 12:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: You may need to check with ja:User:AMD as to whether they're OK with this rename. Otherwise, it may not be possible to carry out this rename. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 240° 23' 15" NET 16:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I left a Google Translated message on their talk page. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 16:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I Allmightyduck from the English Wikipedia. I take over, "rob" I hope you under the same name as the English Wikipedia account. I Do not speak Japanese, was used to write this message translations. Preferably in English Wikipedia, feel free to contact me for any questions. Allmightyduck September 30, 2010 (Thu) 16:48 (UTC) TheRasIsBack! 22:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Will you be using the account to actually edit? –xenotalk 13:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd hope to use it as an alt account, per WP:SOCK#LEGIT. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 15:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - actually using it would be preferred to simply taking over a desirable name merely for the shortcut. –xenotalk 15:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you --Allmightyduck (alt)  What's wrong? 14:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anowlin → AndrewN

[edit]

Status:     Done

ANowlin talk 07:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • User has 12 undeleted edits, 4 deleted edits, and 16 total edits. Requesting user has 2852 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Schvenn-Meister → Schvenn

[edit]

Status:     Done

Schvenn-Meister (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi team. I've been trying for months to log back into my old account, unsuccessfully. I was talking with one of the helpers in the chatroom who advised me to take this route. As you can see, the name Schvenn has been around since 2006 on here, but not used more than once. That's because I forgot the password and didn't attach an e-mail to it back then.

I'm very attached to the username, because I actually invented it. Only within the last year, or maybe two have other people started using this name, but very few. They've clearly found my sites at some point and thought it was a unique enough identifier to try to use, as well. Schvenn is actually a derivation of the name Sven, with a German twist. It's about protecting your online identity, as I'm sure you can understand. I'm a frequent reader of Wiki, but haven't been able to contribute because of my lapse of memory regarding this account. Your consideration is appreciated.

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia that are now deleted. Usernames with only deleted edits can usually be usurped.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 1 deleted edits, and 1 total edits. Requesting user has 1 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 13° 15' 15" NET 00:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note I spoke to this user over IRC, in the help channel; they explained their plight. As there was no email registered, we could not request a password reset. Therefore, I suggested this procedure - creating a new account, and usurping - based on the fact the SUL is clear, and it's one edit, from 2006. Despite the low edit count / policy re. 'established users', this seems a very genuine and honest case, where the user has used the name elsewhere and would like it for consistency. Hence suggesting usurp, anticipating your benevolence and flexibility :-) Hope this is all good, thanks,  Chzz  ►  01:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Britneysaints → Britte

[edit]

Status:     Done

Britneysaints (talk) 15:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 1403 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Grain

[edit]

Status:     Done

81.200.20.203 (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 23:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: This qualifies for a speedy usurp, since User:Grain was created over 4+12 years ago (25 February 2006) and has no edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 354° 36' 45" NET 23:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's strange, but I have left such notification ... 81.200.20.203 (talk) 09:24, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. WJBscribe (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Grain (talk) 05:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Makkon → Ras

[edit]

Status:     Done

Makkon (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Platyfishkeeper → Parasect

[edit]

Status:     Done

Platyfishkeeper (Formerly 水の男の子) 17:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SUL account deleted please go ahead --Jyothis (talk) 19:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Djlordi → Stryn

[edit]

Status:     Done

Djlordi (talk) 08:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jessegillan → Jesie

[edit]

Status:     Done

Jessegillan (talk) 00:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 259 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 13° 38' 30" NET 00:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Tremel → Mad Scientist

[edit]

Status:     Done

Edward Tremel (talk) 00:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 290 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 00:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you b:User:Mad Scientist? Since they have best claim to the SUL. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 15° 42' 30" NET 01:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I'm not. However, the Wikibooks user has made only 8 edits and has not used the account since 2005. It seems reasonable to me to conclude that the Wikibooks account is also inactive and will never lay claim to the SUL with the Wikipedia account. Is there a way this can be acceptable, or does the existence of the Wikibooks account mean I can't have this username? --Edward Tremel (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shittlying → Numist

[edit]

Status:     Done

Shittlying (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have the account numist more or less everywhere else on the internet.

sorry about the badly-chosen username. started copying captchas until one of them worked (actually, this was a misspelling of one).

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 3 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Please note that you can change the email on your account yourself, by going to Special:Preferences. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 17:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right, bureaucrats can't change the email address set in preferences. –xenotalk 17:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Shittlying (talk) 17:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benner9 → FlyingKiwi

[edit]

Status:     Done

Benner9 (talk) 10:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • User has 0 undeleted edits, 0 deleted edits, and 0 total edits. Requesting user has 114 edits. ClueBot VI (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for being an egg, but I clicked some links and mistakingly moved FlyingKiwi. I didn't think I would have permission. Sorry! Benner9 (talk) 10:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries - moved back. This looks fine after the hold. –xenotalk 13:06, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battleaxe9872 → Albacore

[edit]

Status:     Done

Battleaxe9872 وکیپیڈیا 23:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 1516 undeleted edits and 283 deleted edits, for a total of 1799 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 1895 total edits on 84 wikis. AnomieBOT 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar-check → Bookworm15

[edit]

Status:     Done

Grammar-check (talk) 02:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The listed current username "Grammar-check" is not registered. AnomieBOT 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KMLP → Kleopatra

[edit]

Status:     Done

KMLP (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 219 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 220 total edits on 5 wikis. AnomieBOT 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneAnonymous DissidentTalk 08:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Dunderklumpen

[edit]

Status:     Done

90.48.123.232 (talk) 19:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user has made contributions on another Wikimedia project (fr.wiki), this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary frwiki) exists for the target user, with 3544 total edits on 5 wikis. 5 unattached accounts exists with this name, with 27 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. AnomieBOT 19:39, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: This qualifies for a speedy usurp, since User:Dunderklumpen has no edits and was created almost 4 years ago on Christmas Day 2006! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 323° 45' 45" NET 21:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - Dunderklumpen [Hello?] 11:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

MisterHappydolphin → D winchy

[edit]

Status:     Done

MisterHappydolphin (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: This qualifies for a speedy usurp, since User:D winchy is indefinitely blocked. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 286° 18' 15" NET 19:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • This user was created less than 6 months ago, such usernames may not be usurped. You can file another request when the username is older than 6 months.
  • This user is currently blocked by Jpgordon for Abusing multiple accounts
  • Target user has 2 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the target user, with 2 total edits on 1 wiki. Requesting user has 12 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 12 total edits on 1 wiki. AnomieBOT 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley 'Entanio' Russell → Entanio

[edit]

Status:     Done

Ashley 'Entanio' Russell (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 158° 24' 0" NET 10:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 3 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 3 total edits on 6 wikis. AnomieBOT 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wbrz → Zrb

[edit]

Status:     Done

Wbrz (talk) 22:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username has an email address set.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 964 undeleted edits and 255 deleted edits, for a total of 1219 edits. AnomieBOT 17:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: The account looks usurpable after a 7 day hold. However, the username Wbrz should be OK to keep as long your editing is not promotional since most will not have heard of WBRZ-TV. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 160° 45' 30" NET 10:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Thesevenseas (talk · contribs); if you want to keep "Wbrz", there should be no issue. –xenotalk 13:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't want to keep "Wbrz", because I'm not a Louisiana native. --Wbrz (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is your choice. –xenotalk 20:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My first choice was a mistake. --Wbrz (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. This will proceed after the hold period. –xenotalk 20:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kmusgrave → Msgv

[edit]

Status:     Done

Kmusgrave (talk) 13:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 2 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). Requesting user has 511 undeleted edits and 132 deleted edits, for a total of 643 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 653 total edits on 5 wikis. AnomieBOT 13:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → MaxMax

[edit]

Status:     Done

92.42.31.19 (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user has made contributions on another Wikimedia project (ruwiki), this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary ruwiki) exists for the target user, with 3242 total edits on 3 wikis. 3 unattached accounts exists with this name, with 3242 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. AnomieBOT 18:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Amga

[edit]

Status:     Done

87.188.254.199 (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • This user has made contributions on another Wikimedia project (dewiki), this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary dewiki) exists for the target user, with 558 total edits on 29 wikis. 2 unattached accounts exists with this name, with 0 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. AnomieBOT 15:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Small Axe

[edit]

Status:     Done

149.225.62.134 (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 2 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary dewiki) exists for the target user, with 13413 total edits on 1 wiki. 1 unattached account exists with this name, with 2 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. AnomieBOT 21:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: This qualifies for a speedy usurp, since User:Small Axe was created over 4 years ago (11 March 2006) and has only two sandbox edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 330° 55' 0" NET 22:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Cirdan

[edit]

Status:     Done

92.231.86.113 (talk) 22:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
  • The target username has made edits to Wikipedia. Due to licensing concerns, this may be a barrier to usurpation.
  • Target user has 148 undeleted edits and 2 deleted edits, for a total of 150 edits. An SUL account (primary dewiki) exists for the target user, with 6459 total edits on 55 wikis. 8 unattached accounts exists with this name, with 165 total edits. The local account is NOT attached. AnomieBOT 22:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The last edit by User:Cirdan was over 4 years ago (20 September 2006). The user has no log entries. This may qualify for a speedy usurp due to user inactivity. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 333° 47' 0" NET 22:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None (SUL request) → Merridew

[edit]

Status:     Done

  • Target username: Merridew (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
  • For renamer use: Email target usernameusurp user
  • Datestamp: 01:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirmation link: [none... here]
  • Reason: Hi. I've been referred to as simply 'Merridew' in some recent discussions and think having this user name under my control with redirects to my real account a prudent move. I found that the account already exists but has no edits, log entries other than creation, and it has no sul conflicts. It was created most of five years ago (and not by me). My intent is anti-impersonation, to use it only for the redirects and not editing, and to unify it WMF-wide. Thanks.

Jack Merridew 01:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@bot: ↓ no unattached accounts exist. ;) Cheers, Jack Merridew 01:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note:
  • The target username meets the requirements for usurpation.
  • The current owner of the target username does not have an email address specified.
  • Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. No SUL account exists for the target user (unattached accounts may exist). AnomieBOT 01:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've now created the SUL account on meta commons and it all unified except for en:wp. I wanted to avoid anyone taking an account out there during the 7 days. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: This qualifies for a speedy usurp, since User:Merridew was created almost 5 years ago (19 December 2005) and has no edits. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 202° 12' 30" NET 13:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Terima kasih" ;) Jack ("David;") 06:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]