Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 16
September 18 >

September 17

[edit]

Category:Precision FC players

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A semi-anonymous club. I don't think it deserves a category, especially since it only has two players, and the sources that mention that they play for it are from a blogging site and social media. EpicAdventurer (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Superoxide generating enzymes

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There's only one page and a redirect in this category. Upmege for now as it's not helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 20:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Toxic enzymes

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:Toxic enzymes

Category:Saint Paul Seminary School of Divinity alumni

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:Saint Paul Seminary School of Divinity alumni


Category:History of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, duplicate of Category:Military of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. I would not object renaming the latter to Category:Military history of the Republic of Afghanistan. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:SpaceX astronauts

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:SpaceX astronauts

Category:Lechitic nobility

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Arbitrary category: Lechites did not have nobility, because applying the concept of nobility to ancient tribes would be an anaccronism. More important: there is no sources that discuss "Lechitic nobility". --Altenmann >talk 18:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Had most of them extinc early 11century like Nankonids, Jaxa of Copnic, Wiprecht of Grotzich, House of Wizlaus, Drogowit, Pribislaw of Branderburg, Jaromir of Rugia, Wenceslaus Kottwitz and others has only conetction here to Lechites. They where west Slavic Lechitic nobilites finished 11century mostly. Cannot put them Nowhere else.End also Pomeranian noobility and Sorbian are subclass and part by tree of Lechitic nobility. 2001:9E8:54F4:4900:B15A:EA5:7F4B:676A (talk) 02:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You provided no evidence to your claims. And you are adding articles to your categories without supporting evidence in articles. You are editing from a dozen of IP addresses without having a Wikipedia user account. This makes any discussion with you impossible, because you are not answering to notices left in talk pages of these random IP accounts. --Altenmann >talk 04:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:20th-century disestablishments in East Germany

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:20th-century disestablishments in East Germany

Category:Sports executives by sports organizations

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete; any category that can fit here is already fitted in the much better organized Category:Sports executives by sport. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Baseball players from Northern Ireland

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete and dual merge per nom. Only one article and that of the same person. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Major League Baseball players from Ireland

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge; so all these players, as stated in the category itself, were born in pre-1922 Ireland when it was still part of the UK. So I suggest this be merged with the UK category BUT also that it be allowed to be recreated if there are, in the future, enough players born in post-1922 Ireland to justify a category. This way, any confusion can be avoided. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Despite being technically correct, as a way to categorise players I don't see it as valuable to a reader. IMO moving "United Kingdom" to "Great Britain" would make more sense. Cashew.wheel (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cashew.wheel, that would cut out anyone from Northern Ireland then. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was initially going to do Cfd a merge all constitunency nation categories for this into the parent category since they are, historically less than a hundred UK-born players in MLB history. What do you think of that suggestion? Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Baseball venue navigational boxes

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to parent categories with no objection to recreation if there are more templates fitting the criteria of this page. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the State of Palestine

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:People from the State of Palestine

LGBT categories, round 3

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 08:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A third (much smaller) batch of categories which were omitted from batch 1 and batch 2. Rename to add the Q per WP:CONSUB and WP:C2D per Talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 14 August 2024. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CFDS discussion
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former objects

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:Former objects

Category:Elite 11 participants

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Category:Elite 11 participants

Category:Second overall NFL draft picks

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A non-defining category. User:Namiba 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As a main article (List of second overall NFL draft picks) exists, the category should be considered defining. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It is defining to be the first overall draft pick since that person is the FIRST of the draft and is considered to be the best player of all the picks. The second overall is the 30th-something pick in the draft and, while still great, is not going to be. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"The second overall is the 30th-something pick in the draft" It's not the 30th pick, it's the 2nd. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiOriginal-9, you know, that's my bad, I mistook second OVERALL as second ROUND! But the point still stands. It still isn't defining in the way it is for a first overall. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would the same logic be applied to the article then? I only made the category to match it. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dissident93, articles and categories have different criteria so the existance of the article isn't relevant to the Cfd. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like WP:COMMONSENSE to me. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 23:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dissident93, your argument is that the category should exist because there is an article listing them. But that isn't how we categorize things at all. Just because there is a list article of something, it doesn't have to or even need to be categorized.
Second overall picks are WP:NONDEFINING and WP:TRIVIALCAT. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Habsburg Bohemia

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename to same format as subcategories of Category:History of the Habsburg monarchy by country. It is not speediable because a redirect Habsburg Bohemia exists. Marcocapelle (talk) 02:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:German expatriates in the Czech lands

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, these weren't expatriates since Bohemia and Moravia were part of the Holy Roman Empire. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Members of the Chamber of Representatives of Belgium

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 25#Members of the Chamber of Representatives of Belgium

Category:Historical monuments in Uzbekistan

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. A rename nomination might find consensus. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, apart from mausoleums the category does not contain monuments and memorials. The mausoleum articles are already in Category:Mausoleums in Uzbekistan, part of Category:Monuments and memorials in Uzbekistan. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depends what Uzbekistan calls its heritage-listed buildings. It appears to be something like "National Register of Immovable Property Objects of the Material and Cultural Heritage of Uzbekistan". -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename? If so, rename target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Empirical evidence

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Evidence. Proposed, seconded, and thirded, with good rationale. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 22:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are only two pages in here, which can be linked directly if they're not already. Mason (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reverse merger: empiricism is a narrower concept than empirical evidence: empiricism holds that true knowledge or justification comes only (or primarily) from empirical evidence. Empirical evidence per se makes no claim about its importance, whether it's primary or secondary in knowledge construction. fgnievinski (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I will tag Category:Empiricism for completeness, but further participation from others to form consensus would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Diplomats of former countries

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I was inspired by a comment on @Johnpacklambert:'s page. I want us to consider renaming this category Diplomats by former country. It fits with the rest of the People by former country tree. Mason (talk) 13:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Defunct games

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 24#Category:Defunct games

Category:Islam and slavery

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 24#Category:Islam and slavery

Category:People from Daye

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contains one entry, and Daye is in Huangshi LibStar (talk) 01:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_17&oldid=1247961208"