Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoological Garden (SEPTA station)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep, and Rename to Zoological Garden (PRR station) Nakon 02:56, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zoological Garden (SEPTA station)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:CRYSTAL and may be outdated. Article is about a proposed rail station that was briefly mentioned by local newspapers back in April 2013, but otherwise, there have been no other references about this proposed station ever since. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- How does WP:CRYSTAL apply to a station that existed in the past? Once notable, always notable. Just because there has been talk to re-open it doesn't mean it has vaporized from history. --Oakshade (talk) 03:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only result in a google news search is the wikipedia article on it. WP:CRYSTAL does apply because it is not currently in existence. Perhaps when it is rebuilt (if it ever is considering it was planned in 2013) it possibly may become notable, but it isnt now and has nothing in the past to make it so. AlbinoFerret 19:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Regardless of the reopening plans, there was a station at this site which closed in 1902, and that station is notable. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 00:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article isn't about the former station, it's about the proposed SEPTA station, hence the article name. It it were renamed or rewritten for the former station (assuming its notability could be established), then that would be a different situation. –Dream out loud (talk) 18:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only that it is about the former station. The name "SEPTA" is simply an affectation based on the proposed future service. Many stations all over the world have newer names based on their current or proposed affiliation. --Oakshade (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename as Zoological Garden (PRR station) until we know for certain that the station is going to be revised by SEPTA. Then expand it and revert it back to its current name. Let's not forget that there was a time when Interstate 495 (North Carolina) was deleted on the basis of WP:CRYSTAL, and now it's a known proposed highway. -------User:DanTD (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rename, as noted by User:DanTD. The proposed station is just, well, proposed. But this was previously a station that existed and the article ought to be kept under an appropriate title. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.