Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Wei (Chinese artist)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 01:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Zhang Wei (Chinese artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a clear hoax. The article relied on six sources:
- Christoph Noe (Ed), Xenia Piech (Ed), Cordelia Steiner (Ed), Young Chinese Artists: The Next Generation, 2008. - No mention of Zhang Wei in the book
- Mario Ciampi, Philip Tinari, Artists in China: Inside the Contemporary Studio, 2007. - Also no mention
- Asia Pacific Art Magazine, July 2008 - Searched the journal for instances of Wei and Zhang. Could find nothing that looked at all like the subject.
- [1] - Talks about a Zhang Wei who was arrested in China, but he was a journalist, and was still imprisoned as of 2008.
- Chinese art exhibit is highly political - Quote attributed to Zhang Wei in the WP article is actually by Britta Erickson. No mention of Zhang Wei in the source.
- Able Art '99 at the Tokyo Metropolitan Art Museum - No mention of Zhang Wei. Material claimed to be about him in the article refers to different artists.
The editor had previously created one article, Wu Junyong, which seems valid, but may have been used to lend credibility to this one. Both the tone and manner of the sourcing reminds me of certain breaching experiments. - Bilby (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - either a hoax, or fails WP:BIO/WP:GNG. Claritas § 19:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.