Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zereshk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to the article about the appropriate plant, once we find out which one that is. Sandstein 12:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I found it from this edit on persian wikipedia. Zereshk is exactly Berberis. As Wikipedia is not a Dictionary we shouldn't have an article for Barberry in every languages. So this articles is not needed. First I thought it should be merged into Berberis article, but I found nothing to be merged [1]. Even I removed wrong interwikis. This article can't have any interwiki. Hessam 18:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep i see nothing wrong with this article, given it has the potential to grow, it is a subcategory of another plant, and already includes references (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 18:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. I agree with Hessam; this article only contains region-specific information on Berberis. Maybe parts of this article can be added to Berberis, but this article can't be kept according to WP:NOT. --Tinctorius 12:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. There are information and references in the Zereshk that can be merged into Berberis. Jay†Litman 12:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect, not sure where. This is a potential search term, having 25k GHits and appearing even in English-language cookbooks; might as well make sure the user ends up somewhere useful when they type it in. My Persian vocabulary and botany knowledge are both kinda shaky, but I had a vague impression zereshk only referred specifically to berberis vulgaris rather than to the whole genus. Anyone know better? cab 16:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep it is a specific variety it seems. if not merge into appropriate article, unless that article is allready too long or vagueT ALK•QRC2006•¢ʘñ†®¡ß§ 17:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's specific what is the difference? Citation is needed! Hessam 20:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.