Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zclassic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:44, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zclassic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article about a new cryptocurrency. This is too soon at best, with the article supported largely by original research, primary sources and advertising and unreliable sources. The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP notability guidelines and most certainly does not have significant in-depth coverage. Please note I have not found much other than promotional hype in my pre-nomination search for sources, but I am happy to discuss any specific sources that may be relevant. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC) — Striking per WP: SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, none of the refs are independent. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 15:57, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails CORP and the GNG. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:05, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources are primarynews or non-indi failing GNG. Widefox; talk 01:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find sufficient coverage in RS. TOOSOON. Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.