Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ylaruam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ylaruam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:JUSTPLOT, as it contains no real-world context, and WP:GNG, as no non-primary sources seem to discuss it. Not a very active user (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Mystara. Perfectly legitimate merge target and merging should always be preferred over outright deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to Mystara per Necrothesp. BOZ (talk) 15:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable fictional location, with only very brief, in-universe plot information. The only sources being used are primary, and coverage outside of that is next to non-existent. Un-sourced material is not needed for preservation or merging. Rorshacma (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the article fails GNG, as it is sourced entirely to primary sources, with information described from an in-universe perspective. There is no information worth merging anywhere, and the proposed redirect target fails GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minute, trivial in-universe content not worthy of its own article. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 22:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 11:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.