Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wurzel Mediengruppe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wurzel Mediengruppe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication subject meets General Notability Guidelines or notability guidelines for organizations. All of the sources both here and on the German article are press releases or derived from press releases.

The article is also extremely promotional in tone - to the extent that if it is somehow notable the article should be stubbed and re-written. Jbh ^Talk 21:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 15:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my findings concur with nom's. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam. Wikipedia is not a replacement for a company's web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.