Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf 359 c

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Wolf 359. Sandstein 16:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf 359 c

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article based on a blog about a preprint from 18 months ago that has never been published. Unless a more reliable source can be find, it is hard to justify this as a confirmed exoplanet despite what the exoplanet.eu database says. Lithopsian (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think a good compromise would be merge with Wolf 359. I passed this article despite dubious sourcing because it was redlinked at that page. (t · c) buidhe 21:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect with Wolf 359, which is a notable object. This is still a candidate planet and is not well studied. Praemonitus (talk) 15:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect with Wolf 359 per above. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.