Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water electrolysis by Pulse Width Modulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL -- The Anome (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Water electrolysis by Pulse Width Modulation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fringe topic, no sources given to establish notability. The Anome (talk) 12:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There really isn't any meaningful content that explains what it is. If there is anything of value to say about this topic it would be better to instead add it to the existing articles pulse-width modulation or electrolysis of water. Peacock (talk) 13:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At best a fringe theory. No evidence that anyone has even demostrated that it will work. And article scarcely manages to describe it anyway. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my prod. If benefits to modulating the rate of an electrolysis reaction with PWM have been published in reliable sources, the technique might deserve a mention at Electrolysis of water. VQuakr (talk) 19:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliably-sourced notability. Based on editor's history, this is may be self-promotion of his own idea. DMacks (talk) 20:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: while this article was about a non-notable fringe theory, there is a non-fringe subject, pulse electrolysis. which is tangentially related to this, that needs an article. -- The Anome (talk) 21:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.