Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikram Dhillon
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 14:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Vikram Dhillon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant self promotion. None of the non-self published references mention this person. VQuakr (talk) 03:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No credible indication of notability; relevant guidelines here are WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER, since he is a director and an actor. Neither of these seems to be met. Note that of the TV shows, TV series and films he has produced/is currently producing, none actually has a Wikipedia article, so there is no indication that his work is notable as yet. --bonadea contributions talk 09:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per the above, and egregious self promotion. Pol430 talk to me 13:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - impressive-looking filmography, but the lack of coverage in reliable sources suggests he hasn't yet achieved notability. Robofish (talk) 23:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.