Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanina Takvorian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanina Takvorian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a real estate businessperson and musician, who has no credible claim of notability under either WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE or WP:NMUSIC and no strong reliable source coverage. As written, this literally just states that she exists without actually detailing any accomplishment that could actually be measured against either notability criterion -- and it sources the fact of her existence to one advertorially toned press release about her musical album and one glancing acknowledgement of her existence as a businessperson within an article that isn't about her. All of which means that nothing here passes any of Wikipedia's inclusion tests. Bearcat (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination - she doesn't meet requirements for WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability.PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Quickfingers (talk) 17:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.