Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie Sununu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chris Sununu. Sandstein 09:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valerie Sununu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 04:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Redirect - As per WP:NOTINHERITED, unless of course there is enough to say from reliable sources for notability and to expand the article. PaleoNeonate (talk) 11:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have amended my vote to recommend redirection instead, which seems to make more sense in such cases, so I agree with Ritchie333. PaleoNeonate (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chris Sununu per WP:INVALIDBIO Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, following WP:NOTINHERITED, as well as a total dearth of sourcing providing any evidence of independent notability. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 08:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Chris Sununu. Most sources I could find were trivial mentions. Adam9007 (talk) 02:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect aa the First Lady of NH to her husband. I don't normally buy the INVALIDBIO argument and think the page needs to be updated, but this is a case where a redirect makes sense, because it is very plausible that someone might be searching for a state-level First Lady in the United States. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect agree not necessarilly per WP:INVALIDBIO- rather, WP:TOOSOON. After all, her husband- and by extension, her- have only held the post for about two months, and there's plenty of time to achieve WP:N. So a redirect which- and ironically ANYBIO implicitly recommends- can be turned into an article, is best. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 11:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.