Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uresia: Grave of Heaven
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Uresia: Grave of Heaven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable RPG Blowdart | talk 16:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep- there are no references to reliable sources to verify the article, however, in an engine search, there are many reviews and information on this game, they just need to be added.--SRX 16:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak DeleteThere is an RPGnet review which I've added to the page in case we don't delete it. It seems to have been favorably received and does have a fanbase, as such things are measured. But its notability is definitely marginal. RayAYang (talk) 17:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to Keep following Craw-daddy's changes. This is at least the second time I've said that in a deletion discussion lately! RayAYang (talk) 03:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bundle and Renom I just spoke with the author on his talk page. I think the rpg articles should be bundled and renommed. Currently the nom is running into issues with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I added a second review to the article. --Craw-daddy | T | 23:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: It is a published gaming book by a notable publisher, and in none of his mass RPG AfDs has nom tendered any explanation of why these games are not notable, either in the nominations or anywhere else, other than to say that he "has concerns." RGTraynor 23:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Created by a notable game designer and published by three different companies. Edward321 (talk) 01:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.