Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyra Banxxx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tyra Banxxx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, fails Gng and PORNBIO. Being interviewed is primary not secondary sourcing. Joke name riding on the coat-tails of a genuinely notable person should not a Wikipedia entry make. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 12:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This entry should be invalidated per WP:ITSNOTABLE. Tarc (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unfortunately fails PORNBIO. –Davey2010^Talk 19:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Insufficient coverage in reliable, independent sources, does not meet PORNBIO. Tarc (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's very accurate analysis. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:14, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.