Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traumatomy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. the arguing around the redirect hasn't overshadowed the fact that the arguments about the sourcing not cutting the mustard have not been refuted Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Traumatomy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Up-and-coming creative ensemble generating some momentum, but Wikipedia:Too soon to meet inclusion per WP:BAND. Sources found are mostly WP:UGC. The review by Eden 2014 is independent in an online magazine, but I'm not sure that is sufficient. They have a respectable Facebook following and may be appropriate for Wikipedia soon, but... WP:CRYSTAL. Gaff (talk) 02:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Some well-meaning editor has now made the page a REDIRECT, pointing to the page Traumatomy (band). I don't know how to fix this page to reflect that change. --Gaff (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/rename. Sources appear on google 1 2 3 in relation to the search term, but the band should be renamed to help improve the article (see Wikipedia:Article titles) in order to avoid any confusion. ITfan1990 (talk) 22:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I history-merged Traumatomy with Traumatomy (band), and then moved it back to Traumatomy because it was under AfD. Someone redirected Traumatomy to Traumatic brain injury, but Google search found no use of Traumatomy as a medical term, but only as the music band. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for your help, but the band should be placed in parentheses. I have restored the page content and redirected the namespace to the band correctly (see above), but kept the {{R from move}} template(s). ITfan1990 (talk)
That was a cut-and-paste move, and I have just history-merged it and put the article back at Traumatomy, where it should remain until this discussion has been settled. Is this discussion about deleting or moving the music band article, or about deleting the redirection? AfD is not the place to discuss deleting a redirection. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the histmerge, but the article clearly doesn't belong there per AfD discussion at this time. As stated above, the band name should be listed in parentheses for now. This time I added a complex histmerge tag, also explaining the naming policy mentioned move. Please be aware of it. ITfan1990 (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Subject fails on WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Google search emits facebook, twitter and other music indexing sites. At the moment this band does not qualify for a Wikipedia page, but they will definitely in coming months. Hitro talk 18:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"This time I added a complex histmerge tag": I have done the histmerge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- It is clearly mentioned in the notice that "article should not be blanked" but it is blanked for like 24 hours now, it is an AfD discussion, it is a 'keep' or 'delete' debate. We should emphasize on basic rules. Hitro talk 19:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 03:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: there is no AfD notice on the page for the band, which is today at Traumatomy (band) (I found it while stub-sorting Category:Stubs), but there is an AfD notice at the redirect for Traumatomy. While this AfD stays open, there should be an AfD notice on the article itself. Could a passing admin (@Anthony Appleyard:?) perhaps sort this out? PamD 15:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment : I have copied the content from Traumatomy (band) and pasted it on the article under consideration, and I have requested Traumatomy (band) to be deleted speedily as per G6.Hitro talk 19:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- My edits are being reverted without any proper reasons by ITfan1990 (talk · contribs), however I believe he or she is new to Wikipedia, so might not be aware of rules and guidelines here. Hitro talk 19:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See above. Stop trying to revert the histmerge that was agreed upon here. Please do not remove the tag again without a valid reason. Thank you. ITfan1990 (talk) 21:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: I've removed the deletion notice from the redirect to the article. To closing admin - if delete, please delete both Traumatomy (band) and Traumatomy.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der yck C. 07:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.