Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 10 games of all time!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Marasmusine (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Top 10 games of all time! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essay, steaming pile of opinionated WP:OR WuhWuzDat 15:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably speedy, due to no content. Lugnuts (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow. OR, every source will call different games. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be OR in progress. Jclemens (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Delete - possibly salt. I only suggest salting for the sheer fact that no article will ever be named this. Article is full of WP:OR, and will never be verifiable. Even if reliable sources are cited, those sources will likely always conflict. Suggest immediate delete so we can focus on articles that might have some notability/verifiability. --Teancum (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. For some reason, the article creator has removed most of the games from the list and replaced them with entries saying "under construction". But regardless of what this article would eventually look like when completed, it would still probably be just a matter of opinion, not a proper encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy! Delete! - Jesus Christ, why is this here? Carrite (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete – Wikipedia is not for personal essays or a free web hosting service, which this what this is. Probably could've saved the time commenting here by PRODding instead, but that's my opinion on it :) –MuZemike 17:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.