Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The slash pairing of Ville Valo/Bam Margera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete with a big stick. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The slash pairing of Ville Valo/Bam Margera

Delete. A supposed relationship but "neither has admitted to have a romantic interest in the other", which makes it totally unverifiable. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 05:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:CRUFT. Royboy crashfan 05:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, completely and utterly irrelevant. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 05:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above; I really think this is a hoax as well --Deville (Talk) 05:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Evan Seeds (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Royboycrashfan. Mikker ^(...) 05:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-04-02 06:43Z
Delete, per nom and Royboycrashfan. --Soumyasch 06:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a hoax, I hear this widely discussed among the Idiot community. But does not belong in Wikipedia. Poledancer 08:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fanficruft. Full disclosure: I'll be honest, I don't understand this whole "slash" fan fiction thing. What's next, The slash pairing of the Phillie Phanatic/Alan Greenspan? (I hope that link never turns blue...) --Kinu ^t/_c 08:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delte. Pure idioticy.Tombride 08:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Makes no sense at all. Grand master ka 14:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although if nobody was looking, Bam would. Deizio 17:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Weatherman90 21:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.