Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The WIRE
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Text
Width
Color (beta)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communication. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The WIRE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unlicensed carrier current AM station. No indication of how it might meet notability guidelines. Lacks references to significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 04:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. RadioFan (talk) 04:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge selectively to the university's Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communication, which already mentions this station (being a DJ on it is part of a specific class they offer). Web searches find a bit of primary coverage from the university, social media, a press release published on a blog, and of course its WP entry and mirrors. Fails WP:N. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per previous commenter. Not notable enough for own article. Unlicensed carrier current station typically don't merit their own articles. Few diverse articles linking to this one. --Fightingirish (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, per Hobbes.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.