Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Poor Man's James Bond (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kurt Saxon. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Poor Man's James Bond

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged as unreferenced since 2008 and appears to fail WP:GNG. The subject not appear to merit any significant coverage on Google Books. The previous nomination in 2006 was closed without a single WP:RS being adduced to show notability. —Brigade Piron (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sourcing is not good. If you look at the 2006 discussion you get claims such as "books are notable". Not every book ever published is notable, especially when it is mainly just a reprint of previously published material.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kurt Saxon, I couldn't find much about this book series.★Trekker (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kurt Saxon, which mentions this topic by name. In general, if a title would make for a useful search phrase, please pursue such alternatives to deletion before nominating an article for deletion. No substantive book reviews found. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 00:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.