Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Peter Pan Effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Peter Pan Effect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album I'm not sure if it qualifies for here or not-it even says it was shelved for 15 years. Wgolf (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Pinging Richard3120 who tagged this for notability. I've added some reviews; unsure if they meet WP:NALBUM / WP:GNG. At worst, redirect to Robert Marlow. Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NMUSIC states that reviews are relevant in determining notability of songs. By analogy, reviews are relevant in determining the notability of albums. There are multiple reviews now in the article, therefore the rules suggest that the article should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 07:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It might be a good idea to create a section in the article that tells what the reviews say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 07:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:22, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- IamM1rv (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Robert Marlow. Discogs is not a reliable source, and there's no staff review at Allmusic. That leaves two reviews, and electricity-club.co.uk looks like it may be a group blog. One good source and one questionable source is not really enough for an article, and I can't find anything better. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.