Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Conservative Woman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Conservative Woman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a blog, created by SPA. No evidence of notability, neither in the presented sources nor in a WP:BEFORE. Lots and lots of WP:REFSPAM - but only one reference link that even mentions the site itself (the New European link) - none of the other references are about The Conservative Woman blog, they're about the authors or contributors. A quick WP:BEFORE showed nobody talking about this site. The previous AFD ended "no consensus" and talked about newspapers discussing the site - but they're not in evidence. At the least, the long sections puffing up the authors need cutting - I was going to cut those, but then the article would literally only have the New European link as a reference. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Doesn't pass the WP:GNG: there's not in-depth coverage of The Conservative Woman in independent reliable sources, which is reflected in the lack of material in the article. Ralbegen (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG - the references in the article don't seem to talk about "The Conservative Woman", rather, about its contributors/founders, and several which are references to the website itself. Also, I can't seem to find any sources elsewhere that demonstrate its notability. Seagull123 Φ 15:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.