Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bloc
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- The Bloc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Found in underlinked backlog. This article about an advertising agency has a number of sources but they're exclusively press releases, non-notable industry awards. There are no reliable sources to be found, either present in the article or in a WP:BEFORE. A Traintalk 21:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the content reads like promotional material, and there's no particular claim of notability. The references listed are almost entirely the trade press. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, borderline G11. Promotional in tone and the sources are all low quality "newswire" sort of services that look to make their money from printing press releases. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC).
- Delete per nom.Refs are not very good, fails the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 14:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.