Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Audinator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Audinator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software product with no sources cited to indicate notability. The article gives two sources, but they are about the auditing issues that this software is meant to correct, not about the software itself. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At best, it would appear that this is a case of WP:TOOSOON or WP:CRYSTAL. It reads like an advert. The editor seems engaged enough to have discussed this AfD with the nom, I hope he comes here to offer references to support notability. Roodog2k (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO, the interaction with the editor that created this article could have been a little better. I always assume good faith WP:AGF, and go out of my way not to bite the newcomers WP:BITE. Even when his motive and actions appears clearly and consciously against guidelines. Someone should have at least offered him cookes! (I did.) Roodog2k (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added sources to article in order to indicate notability as suggested BizIntelAnalyst (talk) 13:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment The two sources you added are (1) customer comments from Audinator's own website, which are not independent, see WP:V; and (2) Microsoft's listing of this product as approved, which doesn't show notability per WP:CORP. What we need are independent discussions of the product itself, in reliable sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:56, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Roodog2k. I have searched for sources and found none. That is, of course, not to say they don't exist but any that exist are certainly elusive. - UnbelievableError (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, no indication of notability. --HighKing (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.