Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapeball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Let's call it a hoax. It's obviously not appropriate. — Scientizzle 21:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tapeball

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Month-old office sport. Obvious delete, but not technically speediable. Contested prod. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 21. Snotbot t • c » 20:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. One does not add articles of this nature to ones encyclopaedia... and per WP:A SPORT MADE UP ON A SLOW DAY AT THE OFFICE. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:47, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not and cannot even make a claim to notability. Although not one of the categories of things eligible for an A7 speedy, I don't think anyone would be sad if this got excised early. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - As a possible hoax, and most definitely because Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. The article was already speedy deleted once, and the page creator immediately recreated it afterwards. And then once this article was nominated for deletion, he recreated the article once again here: Tapeball (Lunchtime Sport). Rorshacma (talk) 20:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.