Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takayuki Inoue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Create dab page. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Takayuki Inoue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only notable role is as Tolle in Gundam Seed. No news sources to show notability. Recommend redirect to Tolle. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This article was one of many I created when I first joined Wikipedia back in 2006 and Gundam was my whole world at that time. I have no issue with it being redirected, but just FYI the character article for Tolle got redirected to the character list a long time ago. You might want to redirect this to that to avoid a double redirect. Shaneymike (talk) 19:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • That complicates things. A dab page might be the best option, but it still has the same problem where a voice actor's career is ignored in favour of a single role that is arbitrarily perceived to be the only thing a potential reader is interested in. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.