Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StressCheck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

StressCheck

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a poorly sourced advertising brochure for a non-notable software product. My searches have shown nothing beyond the product's own web pages, which do not confer notability, and spurious hits for other things that have the same name. Reyk _YO! 16:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coolperson177 (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

del - no independent coverage of the product, no evidence of notability. Lembit Staan (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not satisfy notability criteria with sufficient notable references coverage. It also reads much like an adversitment.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 06:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.