Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategy Game Guides

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. by User:Maxim. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strategy Game Guides

Declining speedy, but this is unsalvageably unencyclopedic. - Dank (push to talk) 17:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 17:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Blatant original research. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, how about just redirecting it to Strategy guide and be done with it? Beeblebrox (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No! Some people (game players hardcore gamers) really need these articles to help them. To someone who just likes to play games, this article is not important. However, this article is really aimed towards hardcore gamers or people who really really want to beat a game. Or to people who just want to help. In this perspective, this article is a great edition to the game universe.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Marasmusine (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, as Beeblebrox suggests, and quickly. Will leave kind note on contributor's talk page about original research. Marasmusine (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apoofanickymama (talk • contribs) 17:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it is a great article! IF you do not think so, how about we just leave it alone. It is just one article! Please let it stay! It is a very good article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apoofanickymama (talk • contribs) 17:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How could you guys think this is a bad article? I think that this article is a very creative post by the user! I am friends with apoofanickymama and he is really really great! let it stay! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.17.113 (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC) — 69.138.17.113 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete and redirect to Strategy guide as blatant original research. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. I won't oppose to creating a redirect afterwards. MuZemike 17:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect. Plausible search term but unsalvageably unencyclopedic guide content. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I dont even know where to start with what's wrong with this article. Redirect per Beeblebrox. Q ^{T C} 17:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that we can retain this article. The thing to do is to conduct this discussion politely to minimize hurt feelings. The author did put effort into helping us and deserves an explanation with few blue links to policy, and if possible, the text should be copied to some more appropriate place outside WP.

I can give it a shot, but I'm easily distracted by shiny objects. --Kiz o r 17:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.