Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Carmichael
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Stephen Carmichael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article makes several laudable efforts at establishing the notability of the subject, but none of them reach the standards of our thresholds for inclusion of musician biographies as far as I can tell. Researching for significant coverage in reliable sources was unsuccessful, but I will gladly withdraw this nomination if someone else can succeed in this. Skomorokh 11:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 17:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 17:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 17:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's not a good sign that no editor could even be bothered to render the opinion. A quick read proves that the entry simply isn't worthy of consideration. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A simple google search returns only the article. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 17:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per failing WP:BIO and WP:GNG. ArcAngel (talk) ) 21:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.