Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sten Adventures Book 7: Vortex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sten Adventures Book 7: Vortex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2015. Attempted to find coverage on ProQuest, EBSCO, and JSTOR (my go-tos for writing articles about books) with various search terms to no avail. Google brought up a single article on Tor.com which is about the series as a whole, not just this book. Nothing significant on Google Books or Google Scholar, either. Not seeing a way this meets WP:NBOOK. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not seeing any reviews or anything that would help it pass Wikipedia:Notability (books) or broader GNG. PS. I prodded all volumes but the first one as I couldn't find a single review that discusses them :( (I did find a decent review for the first book and the overarching series, which I added to the relevant articles). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not seeing any third party sources either. Does not meet WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.