Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Paul's Primary School Woodridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Woodridge, Queensland. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 00:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St Paul's Primary School Woodridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since Primary Schools do not have inherent notability and thus do not qualify for inclusion unless they are notable for other reasons, I am nominating this for deletion on the basis that it has insufficient notability to qualify for a Wikipedia article. It's a very pleasant brochure for what is doubtless an excellent school, but simple excellence is insufficient. Fiddle Faddle 11:39, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to a new section in Woodridge, Queensland for its schools. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. DOesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this primary school into the article on the school district, Brisbane Catholic Education, or as suggested by Boleyn into a new "Education" section of Woodridge, Queensland. The article cites a single independent source that mentions the school, the local studies handout. Its two sentences about the school do not constitute significant coverage per WP:ORGDEPTH. The remaining sources are not independent (the school, school district, and parish) or are background context about religious figures and charities that do not mention the school. Searches uncovered only one other source, ABC Radio Interview with Choir, Music Teacher, and Principal, that wasn't a directory-type listing or passing mention. This is insufficient to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Worldbruce (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge very few independent secondary sources, and even in the few that there are coverage is limited. Nwlaw63 (talk) 16:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge in to Woodridge, Queensland per above (Brisbane Catholic Education is at the moment piss-poor so not really seeing any point in merging one crap article in to another!) - No evidence of notability to warrant a seperate article. –Davey2010^Talk 18:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merging seems to be the best option as I'm not seeing any substantial coverage of the school. The district page would be the normal target, although the town page is acceptable as well. Pinging @Chiswick Chap: who accepted this at AfC for input. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.