Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Poland
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sports broadcasting contracts in Poland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability. Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL. I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much. SpacedFarmer (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Sports, Lists, and Poland. SpacedFarmer (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. While I agree this is problematic, I think we need a mass nomination and discussion for all entries in Category:Sports broadcasting contracts by country (due to, well, what is a Sports broadcasting contract - it is a red link here, so why do we need lists of a concept we have not even defined yet or shown it is notable?). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, the nominator attempted that and was told that there were simply too many articles for one deletion discussion. I tend to think that it's better to try each of these list articles on their own merits. Esolo5002 (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Esolo5002 Fair enough. No merit I see here - it fails WP:GNG or WP:NLIST. In other words, it is non-notable WP:OR. 'Delete. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, the nominator attempted that and was told that there were simply too many articles for one deletion discussion. I tend to think that it's better to try each of these list articles on their own merits. Esolo5002 (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)- Delete - No merit under WP:NLIST BrigadierG (talk) 10:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia isn't a TV guide. This fails to meet the WP:LISTN criteria. Let'srun (talk) 14:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.