Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spartan Poker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spartan Poker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A run of the mill poker website. Not one of the references used in the article covers the website significantly and independently. Very likely to be a case of COI editing. M4DU7 (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable, significant, independent sources, not notable, written like an advertisement. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this WP:REFBOMBed article fails the WP:GNG and everything else. Chetsford (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. This gave me a pause but at the bottom it cites a press release as a source. So all sources seem in passing or not independent. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, WP:CORPSPAM, etc. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete contains tons of sources but non appears independent coverage. Luciapop (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.