Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shunaid Qureshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 00:26, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shunaid Qureshi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreliable sources, fails to meet notability guidelines, promotional piece Cada mori (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - actually, it seems to be more of a magnet for potential defamation than anything else, due to allegations against him. Bearian (talk) 20:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources currently in article are in-depth, multiple, independent, focusing on the subject, and yes there may be a motive of some contributors to defame the subject, but there are sufficient sources in the article (as of March 31 2015) to justify notability.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--- ------------------Source number 1 is a private company page that is hosted by the same corporation Mr. Qureshi Owns, Source number 2 is blank, Source number 3 is a pdf file with no verifiable information, Source 5 is a dead link, Source 6 is a blog entry with no author, Soruce 10 is a CNN iReport link that was never actually published, Source 12 doesn't even mention mister Qurashi.Cada mori (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Tomwsulcer and passes WP:GNG per various Directorship held. The Subject is the chairman of the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association. Bloomberg here The Dawn here and subject is also the Chairman Pakistan Ethanol Manufacturers Association (P.E.M.A.) as per Directorships here.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.