Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotgun Bo Rivers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Pretty obvious delete. SarahStierch (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Shotgun Bo Rivers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-published author with no indication of notability per WP:AUTHOR. ... discospinster talk 15:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I've nominated it for BLPPROD twice now. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 16:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. Note that, if the author does become notable, an article may end up being appropriate. We're just not there yet, not by a long shot. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 17:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR, no reliable sources provided and none found on a search. Ubelowme U Me 17:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Fails WP: AUTHOR with no assertation of notability, plus it's written in an unencyclopedic and un-neutral format. Electric Catfish 20:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.