Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Lebewohl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Lebewohl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having searched online, I conclude that she is a non-notable author. Fails WP:NAUTHOR. Her father Abe Lebewohl, looks notable enough for an article, but see WP:NOTINHERITED. Edwardx (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Added some reviews of her cookbook from Publishers Weekly, Florida Times-Union, Palm Beach Post, and Lincoln Journal Star. Bakazaka (talk) 19:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a lot of critical attention for her book and I've found some biographical detail. However, since her father is also likely notable, it may make more sense to work on an article about the Deli and include the information from both Sharon and Abe's biography in that article. I would be happy to work on such an article if this closes as "delete" and merge Sharon into it with a redirect from her name. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies GNG and AUTHOR with multiple periodical reviews. Hundreds of library holdings: [1] [2]. James500 (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject verifiably meets WP:AUTHOR#3 as creator or co-creator of a "well-known work" that is the subject of "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". Bakazaka (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: meets WP:NAUTHOR per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.