Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamila N. Chaudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shamila N. Chaudhary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious notability. Nothing significant in coverage. Fails WP:NSCHOLAR. Störm (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly news sources were not checked before this nomination. Mar4d (talk) 02:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. Article could use a bit of cleanup + expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agreed the article needs cleanup, but I do see secondary sources with discussion of her life, her work, and how she's affected the field. Lonehexagon (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.