Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Sherwood
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Scott Sherwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 16:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, totally written in-universe. PROD denied —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom.--MakecatTalk 05:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources could be found to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with the nominatior. It is non-notable, and totally written-in universe. In addition, it only contains in-universe bio., doesn't pass WP:GNG. For the sources it does have, those are not WP:RS, particuarrly IMDb, that is a no-no, WP:IMDB. Sorry. TBrandley 17:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.