Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlet Rowe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlet Rowe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability per WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Two cited references in the article (reliability of either questionable) make only a mere mention of her, and a quick Google search shows no additional info that could be used as references. IMDb appears to be main source for the filmography, but looking at that, no stand-out roles. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ENT. --Killer Moff (talk) 10:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (with prejudice), as per nom – this subject isn't even a "guest actor": they're just an "extra". In fact, this one could possibly have been speedied under WP:A7 IMO. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with respect to the above, she's a little bit more than an extra, but she doesn't yet meet WP:ENT. Not a comment on her talent or acting ability, and I'm sure that this article can be recreated when she gets some bigger roles and more substantial coverage. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 02:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.