Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage Orc
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Savage Orc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional topic TTN (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable gamecruft. The name's generic enough that I don't even think a redirect would be helpful at all.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Warhammer Fantasy (setting).4meter4 (talk) 22:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - There are no reliable, secondary sources that demonstrate why this particular sub-species of fictional race is notable. I also agree with ZXCVBNM that the name is too generic to be useful as a redirect. Rorshacma (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.